Wednesday, January 19th, 2011...1:58 pm

$60 million more in local Madoff ‘clawback’

Jump to Comments

Irving Picard, trustee for liquidation of the Madoff estate, responds to Jan. 7 Jewish World story


The American Jewish World continues to research the aftermath of the Bernard Madoff investment fraud, and has found more so-called clawback complaints against local Jews — the funds sought in the lawsuits total more than $60 million.

As reported previously, Irving H. Picard, the court-appointed trustee for the Madoff estate is trying to recover “fictitious profits” from Madoff’s Ponzi scheme and distribute the proceeds to victims of the scam.

Picard has filed around 1,000 lawsuits against those who transferred more out of their accounts with Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities (BLMIS) than they put in. The lawsuits filed by Picard and his team of lawyers are trying to claw back funds from the “net winners” in the Ponzi scheme. The clawback period extends back six years from Dec. 11, 2008, the day Madoff, who is now serving a 150-year federal prison sentence, was arrested.

In a letter sent to the AJW last week, Picard decried the newspaper’s Jan. 7 article “Kicking back against clawback,” and defended his litigation to recover money from Madoff investors.

“It is a sad but frequently overlooked fact that amounts withdrawn in excess of actual deposits in BLMIS were, in reality, funds unknowingly stolen from other BLMIS customers,” Picard wrote. “This is the essence of a Ponzi scheme.”

The following clawback lawsuits against Jews in the Twin Cities have not been previously reported in the Jewish World:

• Dorado Investment Co., which has a Minneapolis address, and Marshall D. Miller, David J. Miller and Susan Miller, all as general partners in Dorado, were sued Nov. 12, 2010, for around $30.2 million. Picard alleges that the defendants deposited more than $378 million in their BLMIS account, and withdrew about $404 million, so they ostensibly netted money from their Dorado account, which was opened in 1993.

(This lawsuit was reported in a Star Tribune story on Jan. 13, which credited the American Jewish World with first reporting on the local Madoff clawback litigation. Also, as the AJW reported Jan. 7, Picard has sued David Miller and Marshall Miller, as trustees of Minnetonka Moccasin Co., Inc. Profit Sharing Trust, for $4.4 million “in fictitious profits from the [Madoff] Ponzi scheme.”)

• Richard A. Broms, of Minnetonka, individually and as a trustee for the trust bearing his name, is being sued for more than $7.5 million. A BLMIS statement attached to the complaint shows that more than $1.5 million was transferred from the Richard A. Broms Revocable Trust account with the Madoff firm in 2008. The AJW reported early in 2009 that the Broms Family Foundation was one of the local Jewish philanthropies that suffered significant losses in the Madoff scam. The foundation’s assets plunged from $1.7 million to $330,037, according to its 2008 990-PF IRS tax filing.

• Theresa Berman and Lyle Berman, both of Minnetonka, are defendants in a lawsuit seeking more than $3.7 million. The complaint filed Nov. 12, 2010, in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York, names the Bermans individually and as trustees for Theresa Berman Revocable Trust. Another trustee, Sharon Berman Snyder, is also a defendant.

Also, a separate complaint seeking more than $5.2 million names the Lyle Berman Family Partnership. Other defendants are trustees Neil I. Sell and Stanley Taube, and several Bermans, who are beneficiaries of the trust formed in Minnesota.

• The Madoff trustee is suing Alan and Diane Miller, of Wayzata, individually and as trustees of the trust that bears their names, for exactly $4 million. The BLMIS statement for the Alan Miller Diane Miller Revocable Trust shows a $4 million transfer from the account on Oct. 7, 2008, which is within what the lawsuit calls the “preference period,” the 90-day timeframe prior to Madoff’s arrest and the seizure of his investment advisory firm. The second count of the complaint asks the bankruptcy court to disallow the Millers’ claim for reimbursement under SIPA, the Securities Investor Protection Act.

• Attorneys for Picard are seeking $2.7 million from the Estate of Arnold M. Soskin, the Arnold M. Soskin Revocable Trust, Richard N. Soskin, Nancy S. Lurie, Debra Becker, Robert S. Soskin, Samuel S. Soskin and Renee R. Soskin. The defendants live in the Twin Cities, except for Renee Soskin, who has an address in Key Biscayne, Fla., according to the complaint.

• Candice and Charles Nadler, of Excelsior, are being sued for $860,000. The complaint names them individually and as trustees for the Candice Nadler Revocable Trust DTD 10/18/01, which had a Madoff account. The Madoff trustee also denied their claim for losses in the Ponzi scheme on June 22, 2010. Also, the Nadlers’ charitable foundation was wiped out by the Madoff scam. The assets of the Charles and Candice Nadler Family Foundation went from $572,383 to $13,354, according to the organization’s 2008 990-PF tax filing.

• A lawsuit seeks $744,375 from the Stanford M. Baratz Children’s Irrevocable Trust U/A Dated 11/90. Victor S. Greenstein, of Minnetonka, a trustee, is also named as a defendant. The Baratz trust has an address on Ferndale Road in Wayzata. The complaint alleges that the $744,375 in transfers from the trust’s BLMIS account falls within the 90-day preference period. One transfer, according to the BLMIS statement appended to the complaint, was made on Nov. 26, 2008, about two weeks before Madoff’s arrest. The complaint also asks the court to disallow customer claims for relief under the SIPA.

• The AJW previously reported on the $11.4 million lawsuit against Steven and Susan Fiterman; another clawback claim for $4.5 million names as defendants the Miles and Shirley Fiterman Charitable Foundation, and Steven Fiterman and Valerie Herschman as trustees for the foundation. Picard also denied the foundation’s SIPA claim, stating that $24.5 million was withdrawn from its BLMIS account, and $20 million was deposited, and that the Madoff firm never purchased any securities for the account.

The Jewish World also reported in its Dec. 24, 2010, edition that the Miles and Shirley Fiterman Endowment Fund for Digestive Diseases, which benefited the Mayo Clinic’s gastroenterology department, lost $18.8 million in its Madoff investments. The foundation, which was destroyed, is now defending itself from a clawback lawsuit that seeks $716,294, in preference period transfers from its BLMIS account.

In a related lawsuit, Marja Lee Engler, who was married to the late Mendel (Michael) Engler, is being sued for $1.7 million. The BLMIS account for the Mendel Engler Revocable Trust shows cash withdrawals totaling around $8.8 million, from 1986 to 2008.

Michael Engler was named in press accounts as an “investment counselor” for Madoff, and recruited investors from fellow members of the Oak Ridge Country Club in Hopkins. This is how the Minneapolis area joined New York City and Palm Beach, Fla., as a center of the notorious Ponzi scheme.

Of course, Jews are not the only ones defrauded by Madoff; and the AJW will continue to report on the contentious issues in the aftermath of the massive Ponzi scheme.

(This article updates a story posted on the Web site last week, and appears in American Jewish World, 1.21.11)


  • If you think your investments are safe and your statement balance reflects what is in your account, please make sure to read the following petition. Once you read it, please support our efforts and sign it so that your savings will be protected. It would be great if you would also forward this email to everyone in your address book. We need to make sure that Congress knows that our investments are not safe so they can support a newly introduced legislation that will help ius all.

    Our goal is to reach 1000 signatures and we need more support. You can read more and sign the petition here:

    Ronnie Sue Ambrosino
    Madoff Victims Coalition

  • Outraged MPLS Jew
    January 24th, 2011 at 9:37 am

    As a member of the Twin Cities Jewish community, I am horrified that the American Jewish World would publish an article that continues to victimize and embarass the families and individuals whose lives have been affected by the Madoff scheme. Not only were these members of our community publicly harassed by the AMJ once the original story broke, this publication continues to remind the larger Jewish community of their current struggles and uncertain futures. How dare Mordecai Spektor make such a private matter the subject of public scrutiny. Although these figures are public record, it is crass and completely inappropriate to parade the personal hardships of our local community members and celebrated philanthropists across the pages of a newspaper that prides itself on being “a catalyst for Jewish unity and cultural vitality.” Let us unite as a community now and unsubscribe to this excuse of a “community voice.”

  • Rabbi Norman M Cohen
    January 27th, 2011 at 10:36 am

    The Madoff scandal was a devastating event for many people, especially those within the Jewish community. Our synagogues and institutions, people who depended on the strong tradition of Jewish philanthropy, have been hurt beyond imagination.

    Reporting about it is certainly appropriate for a newspaper called the American Jewish World. However, the specific details of individuals, especially those who have played such a positive role in the support of the Jewish community for so many years and decades should be done with appropriate respect and dignity. Jewish values include the mitzvah of avoiding boosha, public humiliation and embarrassment. In fact, we are told that someone who embarrasses another publicly is the equivalent of a murderer as the shedding of blood is obvious by the change in color that appears on the humiliated person’s face.

    The articles in the American Jewish World dated January 5 and January 20 are quite illuminating and provide some insight into the devastating details of this Ponzi scheme. However, many of the details that singled out those individuals might have been avoided in the interest of preserving the appropriateness of using the word Jewish in the banner of your newspaper.

    Rabbi Norman M. Cohen

  • Disgusted Subscriber
    January 27th, 2011 at 2:22 pm

    Mr. Specktor, writing articles to inform the Jewish Community as to the progress in the Madoff fraud case is reasonable and serves the community. Including the individual victim’s names and the dollar amounts of the avoidance claims against them is irresponsible, insensitive, and completely lacking of journalistic integrity or community service. If anything, your recent article is self serving by obnoxiously mentioning the credit for a related story in the Star Tribune.

    Searching for individual case information and using it to further embarrass the victims and their families at a time of immense personal distress for the sole purpose of adding fodder to your article is reprehensible and down right mean.

    I hope that your readers recognize that these investors are innocent victims of a crime and members of the Minneapolis and St. Paul Jewish communities—the very community your publication intends to serve and relies upon for circulation and advertising revenue.

    Why you have chosen to publicly humiliate them, when an equally informative article could have been written without including their names and the dollar values of the claims against them is beyond my understanding. What I do understand is that your reckless disregard has caused further pain to those already suffering. Shame on you.

Leave a Reply